PwC wins Excessive Court docket battle over Quindell leak allegations

PwC’s UK enterprise has efficiently defended a £63mn Excessive Court docket declare that it leaked confidential data that put its shopper Quindell at an obstacle in deal negotiations.

In a judgment revealed on Friday, the Excessive Court docket discovered that software program and insurance coverage group Quindell — now often called Watchstone — had did not show {that a} former PwC companion divulged confidential data to an funding banker at a gathering in 2015.

Watchstone had claimed that the data allegedly offered to the company finance adviser from Greenhill & Co had then been shared with the financial institution’s shopper Slater & Gordon, giving it leverage to submit a decrease bid in talks to amass a part of Quindell’s enterprise.

Nevertheless, the court docket determined that there had been “no actual or substantial probability of a better provide than the one which was made” by Slater & Gordon. The legislation agency finally paid Quindell about £637mn for its skilled companies division.

The assembly between Ian Inexperienced, who was then head of PwC’s UK head of restructuring, and the Greenhill banker got here after the Huge 4 agency was employed by Quindell to assessment the corporate’s funds and provide restructuring recommendation following unfavorable publicity about its accounting practices.

Quindell had argued that Inexperienced had given the banker an “inside observe” and an “authenticated inside [the] tent view” of Quindell’s enterprise, handing Greenhill’s shopper Slater & Gordon leverage to submit a decrease bid than it in any other case would have completed.

In his 85-page judgment, Mr Justice Jacobs stated “the proof introduced by Watchstone in help of its case of severely discreditable conduct on the a part of Mr Inexperienced lacks any actual cogency”.

Then again, the choose concluded that the e-mail by the Greenhill banker to colleagues, allegedly passing on the knowledge given to him by Inexperienced was “unreliable as a file of the assembly”.

PwC stated: “We welcome as we speak’s judgment; we now have at all times maintained that this declare was with out benefit.”

Watchstone stated it was “dissatisfied” with the court docket ruling and was contemplating whether or not to enchantment.

The corporate now not has any operations, having offered off its companies and switched its focus to recovering returns for shareholders by pursuing litigation.

As soon as valued at £2.7bn, its downfall started with a brief vendor assault and a subsequent share suspension in 2015, adopted by a Monetary Conduct Authority investigation. The corporate later restated its accounts by a whole bunch of hundreds of thousands of kilos to rectify “aggressive” accounting practices.

The ruling will come as a aid to PwC because it battles to restrict the worldwide contagion from a separate leak scandal in Australia, which has already resulted in its chief government within the nation and two different senior companions stepping down from their management roles.

Emails revealed final week confirmed that folks on the UK agency acquired data referring to confidential Australian authorities details about a tax crackdown on multinationals. PwC’s world bosses have employed legislation agency Linklaters to hold out a assessment.

Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles